Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Workspace AIX
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 10, 2026

Document emgr_check_ifixes selection logic and add machine-readable output with supersedence and reboot metadata

The emgr_check_ifixes command is a natural starting point for automating AIX security interim fix (iFix) management, but its documentation describes only how to invoke it — not how it selects the fixes it reports, nor the format of its output. In practice the command applies several undocumented selection steps and omits metadata essential for automation.

Observed gaps between documented and actual behavior:

  • Scope - The documentation states it checks the availability of security iFixes for the current OS level. In practice it reports only fixes for products already installed, at a version within the advisory's vulnerable range — i.e. what is applicable to this system now, not everything available for the OS level. These are different sets, and the distinction matters for fleet planning and image-build workflows.
  • Signature validation - Advisories that fail signature validation are skipped with no message to the user.
  • Fix age - An age-based heuristic can omit older fixes, potentially excluding legitimately applicable content.
  • Output - Plain tab-separated text, derived from an undocumented upstream data format, with no supported machine-readable option.
  • Metadata - The output carries neither supersedence relationships nor reboot requirements — both essential for safe, unattended patching.

Requested enhancements:

  1. Document the command's fix-selection logic.
  2. Distinguish "available for the OS level" from "applicable to this system", and offer both.
  3. Provide a supported, documented machine-readable output (e.g. JSON).
  4. Include supersedence and reboot metadata in the output.
  5. Surface, rather than silently skip, advisories that fail signature validation.
  6. Document and make optional the fix-age heuristic.

Business value - Security patching of a large AIX estate must be automated to be timely, consistent and auditable. These gaps require customers to build and maintain custom tooling — parsing an undocumented format and deriving reboot/supersedence information independently. Addressing them would let customers rely on supported IBM capabilities, reduce the risk of missing security-relevant fixes, and lower the maintenance burden of enterprise AIX patching.

Idea priority Low