Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace IBM i
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 22, 2013

Disable the ability to change the record length in existing PF and override and delete existing PF

Disable the record length property option for existing source.
In RDp, when adding a SRCPF with "add to i Project", RDp allows the record length property to be modified, but when revoking the change set, the record length property can not be modified.


Use Case:

1) Developer copies source file from a development machine. The record length is, for example, 125.
2) When he adds the SRCPF to a change set as an RTC version, the record length is changed to 100.
RTC accepts it without any warnings.
The record length is not changed by developer, but instead takes the length set by RTC.
3) When pushed to System i via the build, the system returns errors about the record length.

Development had suggested a way to handle and the customer had responded with the following marked as NOTE:

- if the developer "creates" a new source file in the workspace using the new source file wizard they can assign whatever record length they need to the source file. This allows an lead programmer to create entirely new source files.
- Once the source file is "created" in the workspace its record length value cannot be changed in the properties dialog, but you could change it by directly editing the .properties file for the file if you absolutely had
to.
- Adding a source file to a project from a target IBM i system uses the record length value of the file on the system ("add to i project")

NOTE: The user still can change the record length by this way.

L2 NOTE on NOTE: Is it possible to lock this down so the user cannot change the record length in the .properties?

- Pushing a source file to a target system will use the record length value only for creating a file. It will never alter the record length of an existing file.
- Accepting properties from RTC will override anything the user has entered for record length for a given source file. RTC always wins. If the value
is changed by RTC it will be reflected immediately in the properties of the source file.

If this doesn't work for record length, can you propose how you would like it to work?

NOTE: The customer suggests: As the CCSID or record length is changed, the members in the SRCPF have to be re-pushed. Thus, the original SRCPF should be deleted and the new whole SRCPF should be pushed to the system i.


Idea priority High
  • Guest
    May 12, 2020

    This RFE has been re-evaluated.  Due to the relatively low number of votes, this RFE is now being declined.

  • Guest
    Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Programming Languages
    Product - Developer for Power Systems

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Developer for Power Systems

  • Guest
    May 27, 2013

    This RFE is consistent with our strategy and product roadmap and IBM is continuing to evaluate.