Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace IBM i
Categories IBM i Access Family
Created by Guest
Created on Dec 11, 2018

ACS - Toggle On/Off Column Separators on Print Screens

Please add a check box in Print Screen Setup that allows us to turn off the column separators when doing a print screen. We need to have them visible on the screen, but when we do a screen print, they make the printout very hard to read. This check box should save when the .hod file is saved so that the setting is persistent.


Use Case:

We have multiple screens in our software that have a lot of numeric fields, and when a user does a print screen, the column separators muddy up the report. They are necessary on the screen however, for data entry purposes.


Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 20, 2020

    This support is now available in version 1.1.8.4 dated April 2020.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Feb 5, 2020

    Print Screen Setup will provide an option to set the Column Separator independent of the Display.

    This is planned for our April 2020 update.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 31, 2020

    Thanks for the screens shots. We like to know what font is being used for the 5250 display. Please provide a screen shot of:
    Edit > Preferences > Appearance > Font...

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 31, 2020

    Requested screen shots have been attached.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 31, 2020

    Attachment (Description)

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 31, 2020

    Attachment (Description)

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 31, 2020

    Attachment (Description)

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 30, 2020

    From a 5250 display session where you see the problem, please provide the following 3 items:
    1. A screen shot of the display before printing.
    2. The printed screen. This can be the same format you sent before.
    3. From the same 5250 session, the contents of Help->About

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 13, 2020

    I still see the issue with the latest version. I attached a screen snip of what it looks like when I print to PDF, but it's the same when printing to a printer.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 13, 2020

    Attachment (Description): Sample Screen Print

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 10, 2020

    A change was made in a previous update which changed the way column separators are printed. Using our latest update (version 1.1.8.3), are the printed column separators still causing an issue for the readability of the printed output? If they are, please provide an image identifying the issue.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jan 7, 2019

    IBM has received this requirement and is evaluating it. A response will be provided when evaluation is complete.