Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace IBM i
Categories BRMS
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 19, 2019

Add parameter Start journaling to RSTLIBBRM

Add parameter Start journaling Yes or No to RSTLIBBRM


Use Case:

Opened PMR 26279,122,000 asking what command to use in a scheduled job to restore several user libraries from backups using BRMS to different libraries and the reply was to use RSTLIBBRM. When we did this, journaling is started by default and the journals are restored to the original libraries instead of the new ones where we want them. In PMR 29317,122,000 the reply was to submit a RFE request to add the parameter Start journaling Yes or No to RSTLIBBRM.


Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 12, 2022
    The BRMS team believes that the request described has been solved and is available with the 7.5 base release.
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 26, 2021

    The BRMS team agrees with the request and a solution appears to be desirable and feasible. The BRMS intends to provide a solution. However, BRMS plans may change and no commitment is made that a solution will be provided.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 29, 2020

    This is still on the BRMS team backlog list, the community can continue to vote to influence priority.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 3, 2020

    This RFE is on the BRMS team's prioritized list for future implementation. However, in the meantime, does the work-around mentioned in the Comment below by CAAC fit the need for your Use Case?

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 14, 2020

    The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a medium priority requirement that should be addressed. There may already be a work-around for your scenario for setting up test libraries -- couldn't you just do a CPYLIB instead?

    Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac

    For more details about CAAC's role with RFEs, see http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/Blogs/i-Can/May-2017/COMMON-Americas-Advisory-Council-%28CAAC%29-and-RFEs/

    Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 5, 2020

    The BRMS team will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. The request will be updated in the future if the request is implemented. The BRMS team will use votes and comments from others in the community to help prioritize this request.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 8, 2019

    The BRMS team has received the requirement and is evaluating it. The BRMS team will provide a response after evaluation is complete.