Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace IBM i
Categories Networking
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 1, 2019

TLS 1.3 General support in IBM i OS V7R2 and V7R3

As we work with a.o. banks, financial service companies and government we need to follow the highest security levels. After the implementation of TLS1.2 we more and more feel the need building up to supporting TLS1.3 in the short term for our clients and partners


Use Case:

Secure webservices, FTP and other exchanges


Idea priority Urgent
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 12, 2020

    IBM believes that the request described has been solved and is available with a set of 7.3 PTFs. See https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6151287 for the list of PTFs and other related information.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Mar 17, 2020

    IBM agrees with the request and a 7.3 solution appears to be desirable and feasible. IBM intends to provide a 7.3 solution. However, IBM's plans may change and no commitment is made that a solution will be provided.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 16, 2019

    IBM will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. This request will be updated in the future if IBM implements it.
    Adding System TLS 1.3 support to the IBM i 7.3 release is a high priority candidate for 2020.
    Adding System TLS 1.3 support to the IBM i 7.2 release is not under consideration.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 27, 2019

    The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a high priority requirement that is important to address.

    TLS 1.3 is now considered industry standard and should be available in all in supported IBM i releases.

    Background: The CEAC members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT

    Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 13, 2019

    The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a high priority requirement that is important to be addressed for IBM i 7.3 to allow this new security standard on a currently marketed and supported system. However, IBM i 7.2 is an older release -- although still marketed and supported, customers should be moving to the newer releases and therefore not needing new support on IBM i 7.2 release.

    Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac

    For more details about CAAC's role with RFEs, see http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/Blogs/i-Can/May-2017/COMMON-Americas-Advisory-Council-%28CAAC%29-and-RFEs/

    Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 7, 2019

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - Networking
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - None

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - Core OS
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - None

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 6, 2019

    Fully accepting that we always need to push people to the newest release, this being the security exposure, I strongly recommend a patch for 7.2 also. Three reasons:
    1. Help Systems Marketplace Survey 2019 shows that a good number, 22%, of installations are still on 7.2 and will definitely take an year or two to be current.
    2. Our community is mainly small and medium businesses and some like government institutions or hospitals are continuously highly budget challenged.
    3. And this third one is the dearest to me – reputation management – just imagine that one of them has severe attacks, is a charity institution, and the news hits headlines “they had an old AS/400 …”. We have lived this with the Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme “AN ANCIENT IBM AS/400 was crucial to US investment swindler Bernard Madoff's cunning Ponzi scam …” https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1529209/an-as-400-critical-madoff-ponzi-scheme

    Simple conclusion – a patch for 7.2 for TLS 1.3 is fully justified.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 1, 2019

    Just my opinion but....

    I agree that adding TLS1.3 to IBM i 7.3 would be an excellent use of IBM's resources. But IBM i 7.2 is now of an age where I do not believe it would be sensible to add this unless it was relatively trivial.

    I can understand why a 7.2 customer might have reservations about moving to 7.4 so soon after GA but if TLS 1.3 was added to 7.3 then the 7.2 to 7.3 upgrade to gain this function would seem very compelling to me.

    Cheers Steve B