IBM Power Ideas Portal
This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
In the short term we do not intend to deliver iSCSI attached disk storage. We will continue to monitor the market but as pointed out, there is more to attaching 'cheap storage' than just the protocol. There are storage device drivers and storage qualification that needs to be done if it is a new type of storage being attached and that is specific to the storage controller.
in my opinion the Request aims to attach rather cheap storage to single IBM i LPAR systems which might be a valid idea for small shops to archive data or objects, but with the price tag of adding "cheap" storage systems to a "non-cheap" operating system.
If this is really needed i would suggest to add VIOS as a layer (even only for the second ASP) as then you have some options already available which also can add some redundancy.
.No, because as pointed out just because you have an iSCSI device driver doesn't mean you can attach any iSCSI attached storage. By default you would probably be able to attach the same storage as you can with fibre channel since there are storage device drivers in IBM i for DS8000 and Spectrum Virtualize. The price on those boxes doesn't really change whether it is fibre channel attached or iSCSI attached.
Business Justification: See Use case. Is this sufficient as explanation?
.More Information Needed.
Please specify the storage that you would like to attach. iSCSI is just the transport protocol, IBM i still needs a device driver for the specific storage. Changing the transport from fibre channel to iSCSI for a currently supported device would save a little money but I don't think that is the intention of this RFE.
Under consideration for future plans