Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Post your ideas

Start by posting ideas and requests to this portal to enhance a Power product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,

  1. Post an idea

  2. Upvote ideas and add comments to ideas that matter most to you

  3. Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea

Help IBM prioritize your ideas and requests

The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The Power teams will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.

Receive notification on the decision

Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.

Specific link you will want to bookmark for future use

IBM Unified Ideas Portal - - Use this site to create or search for existing Ideas across all IBM products that are outside of Power, and track all of your personal interactions with all Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace IBM i
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 12, 2020

IBM i V7R1 request for S914 and S924 Support Also

It was announced that IBM i V7R1 will be supporting the S922 and E980 beginning Nov 20, 2020. Multiple partners and clients in the US and Canada have asked why the S914 and S924 are excluded as they have customers with legacy applications that they would like to move to any POWER9 server.

Use Case:

Any legacy IBM i V7R1 should be supported on any POWER9 server not just the S922 and E980

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Apr 13, 2021

    IBM does not intend to provide a solution to this request at this time, so it is being closed. The addition of IBM i 7.1 support on selected Power servers such as the S922A, S922G (other than the 1-core processor) and the E980 was done as an exception with a specific solution scope. Expanding this support to other POWER9 models does not align with IBM's strategy for future investment.

  • Guest
    Nov 24, 2020

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - Install, Upgrade, Licensing
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - Client

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - IBM i Access Family
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - Client

  • Guest
    Nov 16, 2020

    We are IBM ISV's that develop solutions strictly for state and local governments, the need for the expansion to the new "41G" or the "41A" is very important because we still have a number of very large governmental entities that are still on V7.1. Previous to COVID, we were making significant headway in having them pursue a migration to the newer 9009-41A (series/model) and some were looking seriously at the (then) upcoming "41G" models. This has now ALL been but on hold due to this pandemic. However, we still need to support these applications that were natively developed for the Power i platform. This indifference to this segment of the public sector, will only make our systems less appealing in the future once the "dust settles" from this pandemic, thereby putting in serious jeopardy hard won footprints for IBM. It would go a long way if IBM could open this function to this model of the P9's.

  • Guest
    Nov 13, 2020

    is there a list of applications which do not run on 7.2? Maybe better to help supporting the vendors / programmers jump off of 7.1