This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Since the requested support has existed for many years, this RFE is being declined.
Okay, using COMMENT ON and failing, I tried LABEL ON.
Again, specifying TABLE instead of VIEW worked for me.
SEQUENCE(s) also seem to work using LABEL.
Thank you MTosney and IBM Dev.
We can close this one.
Um... the online documentation and the system say otherwise, or I'm "missing a comma" somewhere.
I've tried COMMENT ON and LABEL ON for a VIEW and cannot get anything other than:
Message: [SQL0104] Token DATAF1 was not valid. Valid tokens: (.
I then went into the legacy STRSQL and typed in COMMENT ON and press F4 and see this list which does not include view:
1=File
2=Field
3=Package
4=Index
5=Procedure
6=Parameter
7=Alias
So in light fo the comments in this RFE, I decided to try COMMENT ON TABLE instead of VIEW.
That worked! It changed the VIEW's object text.
Interesting.
I still cannot do that for Sequences, however unless there's a trick to that as well????
Thanks.
IBM needs to understand the function gap you are seeing.
The LABEL statement generates system object text for objects, including views, sequences, and triggers. The COMMENT statement generates long descriptions that are stored in the database catalog tables. Is there something about the LABEL support that is not adequate for your use case?
I think you can already do this. COMMENT and LABEL both support sequences and triggers explicitly.
For views in particular, you need to use the COMMENT ON TABLE/LABEL ON TABLE syntax with the view name.