Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace IBM i
Categories Db2 for i
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 23, 2022

Valid JSON for passing options to SQL HTTP Function

The documentation for the SQL HTTP GET function states the following: > Sets an HTTP header in the HTTP request with the specified headername and headervalue. > This option can be specified multiple times to set multiple headers. The options are passed as a JSON string to the function. But this means that I have to use the "header" key multiple times in the JSON string. This is not valid JSON. Each key must be unique in the same JSON object. So this cannot be valid if multple HTTP headers are added with the "header" key. That also means that this string is not possible to generate because most generators are producing valid JSON and will not generate multiple entries with the same key in one JSON object. Solution: Don't pass HTTP headers as : {"header":"User-Agent,IBM i HTTP function"} But rather pass it as this: {"header": { "User-Agent" : "IBM i HTTP function" } } This will be valid JSON and you can add multiple headers. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.4?topic=functions-http-get
Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Dec 1, 2022
    This enhancement was delivered in December 2022 with IBM i 7.5 PTF Group level 3 and IBM i 7.4 PTF Group level 23.

    A new "headers" option was added that is passed using properly formed JSON.
    The existing "header" option can still be used, but it is not the recommended option.

    The new option is introduced on this page: https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6828313
    It is described in the HTTP options in IBM Documentation here: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/i/7.5?topic=functions-http-get#rbafzscahttpget__HTTP_options.htm

    Db2 for i development team
    IBM Power Systems Development
  • Admin
    Nancy Uthke-Schmucki
    Jul 19, 2022

    The CAAC has reviewed this Idea and recommends that IBM view this as a high priority requirement that is important to be addressed. This is standards-related -- do not break json standards.


    Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual Ideas on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your Idea.


    For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac


    Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager

  • Guest
    Jun 28, 2022
    IBM will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. This request will be updated in the future if IBM implements it.