This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
In a PowerHA cluster, if I perform a save operation (to a tape drive) in a FlashCopy system that information is not spread among other systems in cluster specially production (main) system.
This cause some objects that must be saved before delete cannot be saved in another system different than its own system, for example, Journals Receivers. It would be interesting if the "Save date/time" attribute and others related attributes of the object where replicated and/or distributed when the object is saved on a flashcopy node within the same cluster.
Use Case #1
In a PowerHA cluster we use one of the Flashcopy systems to perform tape backups. Some elements that reside in iASP, such as journal receivers, must be properly saved before being removed from production.
When these objects are saved on our flashcopy system there is nothing in production to indicate that they have already been saved. It can be skipped with DLTJRNRCV DLTOPT(*IGNINQMSG), however it is not certain that they were saved completely.
This forces having to save these elements directly in production to ensure that they have been properly backed up before they are eliminated.
Use Case #2
We have store procedures that delete some "temporary" files in production every week, these files reside in libraries in iASP and are saved in FlashCopy. It would be very helpful if some system views like QSYS2.OBJECT_STATISTICS included some information that the item was saved on another node in the same cluster.
Idea priority | Medium |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.