IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Workspace IBM i
Categories Languages - RPG
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 1, 2022

RELATED IDEAS

Merged idea

This idea has been merged into another idea. To comment or vote on this idea, please visit IBMI-I-1461 Possibility to specify a compare procedure for SORTA and %LOOKUPxx.

SORT allow callback and ascending/descending multi fields for datastructure Merged

Multi field sorting was delivered with: https://ibm-power-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/IBMI-I-2197


But this feature seems half-implemented because it doesn't allow ASC/DESC.... Please give the possibility to specify *ASCENDING and *DESCENDING when specifing multi fields. i.e.

OR

add the possibility to specify a procedure to call (callback), accepting two DS elements as parameters ad returning -1 (less) or 0 (equal) or 1 (greater) ... this would be the most elegant solution IMHO... like many other languages do for the "user" sorts....


DCL-DS array QUALIFIED DIM(3);
      id PACKED(5);
      name VARCHAR(10);
      type CHAR(2);
   END-DS;

   array(1).name = 'Alice';
   array(1).id = 34567;
   array(1).type = 'AB';

   array(2).name = 'Tom';
   array(2).id = 65432;
   array(2).type = 'CD';

   array(3).name = 'Alice';
   array(3).id = 12345;
   array(3).type = 'AB';

   SORTA array %FIELDS(name *ASC: id *DESC);

or

SORTA array %FIELDS(*CALLBACK sortmyarrayproc);




Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Aug 3, 2022
    Your request is a duplicate of Idea IBMI-I-1461, with the title "Possibility to specify a compare procedure for SORTA and %LOOKUPxx". Please use that Idea to cast a vote or add a comment. https://ibm-power-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/IBMI-I-1461

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.