This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Today RDi uses timestamps for testing local and remote members for changes. If the timestamps do not match, the Remote Reconciler assumes that a member was changed on the local or remote system. But of course that may not be true. For example, members are always considered to be changed, if an i Project is copied from an old workspace to a new workspace, e.g. if:
a workspace was broken
a new version of RDi shall be tested
an i Project has been checked out to a new workspace
In these cases the developer first needs to start the Remote Reconciler and then check each member for changes if the compile library is shared with other developers. Even a dedicated compile library of his own would not help, because all members are "incorrectly" reported as "Changed".
Please change the way of testing members for changes and use a checksum in addition to timestamps. First compare the checksums. If the checksums match the members are equal and can be considered as unchanged. If the checksums are different, check the timestamps to figure out the new version.
The checksum of a member could be stored along with the timestamp in the *.properties file of the member. This way it would be uploaded to a Git or SVN repository along with the member. Cloning the repository to a new workspace would not mark all members as changed and the developer could start working immediately without comparing each member by hand.
Idea priority | High |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
IBM Power Systems Development - RDi team
The CAAC has reviewed this IBM Idea and recommends that IBM view this as a “nice to have” low priority feature.
There are already solutions to provide this functionality, however, if we are encouraging DevOps approach to programing this will be a nice improvement.
Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual IBM Ideas on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your Idea.
For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac
Carmelita Ruvalcaba- CAAC Program Manager