Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Workspace IBM i
Categories Save and Restore
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 23, 2024

DUPTAP performance should be improved

We recently found out, that DUPTAP has an expected behaviour that it takes twice as long as the SAVE-process. If the save-process exceeds 8 hours than one day (i.e. 24hrs) will not be enough to create a duplicate of the tape which is a requirement for banks for example.

It is not logical that a streaming input device which in our case (LTO7) can deliver data at a rate of 300MB/s and a writing device which can write 300MB/s work in a sequential way. I.e. it reads from the input tape, then it writes to the output tape and again. This results of course in a double time for the whole process.

Using a rolling buffer this should be a process running fairly in parallel and therefore having a better performance for the duplication. Maybe this might use a direct stream from input tape to output tape not involving much CPU cycles at all.

For a 6,5hour Fullbackup it took more than 13 hours to duplicate the tape. The job needed about 11 CPU seconds for this 13 hour work.

I thought using a rolling buffer in between that is written to at one side and read from another might solve this problem. We have 16 buffers in I/O for every path. I understood that todays SSDs are able to deliver data very fast, but a streaming device is able to deliver data at a streaming rate of the maximum for compressed data (which is 300MB/s at LTO7).

I understand that there will sometimes be a short delay. If it is not as fast as the backup that would not be a problem, it should be near the calculated optimum, but twice as long as the backup is a problem. At the moment it would be faster to do the backup twice than using the duplication process once the backup has been completed.

Please consider searching for a solution to this.

Idea priority Medium