Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Workspace IBM i
Created by Guest
Created on Dec 4, 2024

Enhance the CPIAD09, CPIAD0B, and CPI3E34 messages to indicate whether the connection came in an a secure port or a non-secure port

The subject messages are all very similar and are logged to the history log when new connections are made to the system.  These messages are very useful to understand the workload for connections to the system.  However, there is no ability to determine whether the connection came into the system via non-secure ports or secure ports.  With the database server (QZDASOINIT and QZDASSINIT) and the file server (QPWFSERVSO and QPWFSERVSS) you can distinguish between the two because the job names differ, but for DDM/DRDA, the signon server, the remote command server, (and the other host servers) this job name difference does not exist.  

 

We are working on a project to move to all secure connections and as the project is underway, we need a way to measure the progress from non-secure to secure connections. Having an indicator in the subject messages would be extremely helpful.  (Or different job names between secure and non-secure would also address the challenge).  This approach doesn't require additional information to be logged - just enhance what already is being done. 

The circumvention is to use auditing and enable *NETSCK and *NETSECURE auditing, but this adds a lot of additional audit entries to the audit journal.

Idea priority Medium