IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Workspace IBM i
Categories Languages - RPG
Created by Guest
Created on Aug 24, 2012

RELATED IDEAS

Option to suppress RNF7031 messages in F-specs

I always clean up any unused variables in a program before I implement it so other programmers won't be confused. As an aid to cleanup, I compile the program with RDp and then double click one of the messages in the error list so the messages are placed into the source in the LPEX editor. It would be a quick way to spot potential issues if all the unused fields from files weren't posted to the F-specs, adding a lot of clutter that is of no concern to the programmer. I'd like to have an option to turn off posting the RNF7031 messages to the F-specs only to make it easier to spot the real issues. Of course, I would still want them posted to D-specs.


Use Case:

This feature would be useful in making program code and error messages in RDp easier to read, leading to fewer potential problems later and better efficiency.


Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Jul 29, 2020

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - Languages - RPG
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - None

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Programming Languages
    Product - Developer for Power Systems
    Component - RPG/COBOL Development Tools
    Operating system - Windows
    Source - None

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     May 8, 2019

    Not only f-specs are a problem, and the priority of this should be higher

    In XML processing, you often need to build huge data structures and templates that are nested and thus producing a high amount of unused fields. We have programs that being compiled results in up to 40000 RNF7031 messages. Compiling is very frustrating when you have to wait many minutes for the error list to appear, so we compile such programs with option(*eventf). But of course you then don't see the actual errors.

    So it would be a great feature to have an option to not load RNF7031 messages from EVFEVENT into RDi _at_all_.

    I also posted a topic about the problem in the RDi forum: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=758bf477-e0d9-4d6e-b857-5faa16f6f3f4&ps=25

    Please let me know if opening a separate RFE for the issue could help.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Programming Languages
    Product - Developer for Power Systems

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Developer for Power Systems

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Nov 7, 2012

    This RFE will be under consideration for a future release. Status has been updated to Uncommitted Candidate.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Oct 2, 2012

    This RFE is consistent with our strategy and product roadmap and IBM is continuing to evaluate.

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.