This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
See this idea on ideas.ibm.com
Want RSE to have a Merge feature to go along with the Compare feature. Have it work like WRKMBRPDM Option 55 of PDM.
Before we move something up to Production, we compare(CMPM) the test program with production program. Check to see if code from other programmers is in it and needs stripped out (we put Project numbers in Column 1-5 of the COBOL code to show which project it belongs to). If differences, I would rename the program in Test and copy the program down
from Production, do WRKMBRPDM option 55 to compare and merge just my lines of code into the production program (some programmers just copy and paste but find the Option 55 much more useful and less errors happen).
Idea priority | Low |
By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.
This RFE is a duplicate of another RFE. See https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=70905 for current status.
In rereading the requirement, it is not clear that 3-way merge is really the issue. I now infer that what is really required is to do a merge on members in the RSE view. And this is an existing requirement at https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=70905
which has already garnered more votes.
Please vote for this latter RFE in order for it to reflect its true priority.
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Programming Languages
Product - Developer for Power Systems
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Rational
Product family - Design & development
Product - Developer for Power Systems
This RFE will be under consideration for a future release. Status has been updated to Uncommitted Candidate.
This RFE is consistent with our strategy and product roadmap and IBM is continuing to evaluate.
Just clarifying for our internal reference:
PDM option 55 allows a 3-way merge from a common ancestor. Eclipse also provide this for Java. RDp would need to extend this Eclipse mechanism to work when 3 IBM i members are selected.