IBM Power Ideas Portal
This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
IBM Power Systems Development
IBM Power Systems Development
I will add to this the fact that Microsoft Power Automate Desktop does not currently have a 32-bit option, so any automations designed to use the Terminal Emulator actions with Unattended Power Automate Desktop Flows will not work with ACS until this functionality is in place.
@IBM Power Systems Development
Thanks for the update, totally looking forward to seeing this. Happy to partake in beta testing if that helps.
Greg.
IBM Power Systems Development
IBM Power Systems Development
Likewise can CAAC please review the "Medium Priority" that this idea was assessed as since that was two years ago now, and what was considered medium in 2021 may now be rated higher given it is 2023 and we now have only two years before the EOL date for 32 bit Office.
Also refer to https://ibm-power-systems.ideas.ibm.com/ideas/IBMI-I-3799
Can someone from IBM please comment on any planned timelines for this request. Our company has to make some business decisions if this will not be available in the next 6-12 months.
We too have hundreds of VBA macos which were rendered unusable when upgrading the IBM emulator from PCOMM iSeries Access for Windows (32 bit) to IBM I Access Client Solutions ( 32 bit). We are running Windows. We are running Microsoft Excel (64 bit). We hope this EHLLAPI bridge update will allow us to salvage the large investment in Exce/IBMi macros.
Following on from Nancy's comment below I would like to ask IBM to review this idea's status, I see it is still tagged as Low and we have a hard deadline for it to be completed by.
Windows 10 will reach end of support on October 14, 2025 and after that I think there will be no more 32 bit options available. I would like to know if IBM is going to include this idea into the roadmap so that our (and many other global customers) existing processes will be backwards compatible post Windows 11 deployment.
Cheers
Greg
''
The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a medium priority requirement that should be addressed.
It appears that moving to Office 64-bit is not an absolute necessity at Windows 10, so this would be a "nice to have" improvement for that version, but Windows 11 early information implies that there will be no 32-bit version, so this becomes much more important.
Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac
Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager
IBM understands this request and will consider it for a future code update, though no commitment is made or implied.
IBM has received this requirement and is evaluating it. A response will be provided when evaluation is complete.