IBM Power Ideas Portal
Hide about this portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas

  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Not under consideration
Workspace IBM i
Categories Db2 for i
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 2, 2020

RELATED IDEAS

tool to summarize all PTFs and APARs in a CUME or group

See this idea on ideas.ibm.com

CUMEs can contain hundreds of PTFs. Each PTF has an APAR and both should be reviewed for any special instructions and or issues in the APAR. It would be good to have a tool to filter through all this and summarize any actions or special issues.


Use Case:

One customer ran into an issue where they applied a PTF that enhanced a timestamp field. The customer compiled a program on test system and this enhancement worked fine. They moved the program into production and that is when the problem started. The program failed due to the PTF not being on the production system. The fact that you needed to have the PTF on any system that uses this special time stamp was documented (it needs to be on for compiling and running), the customer didn't read the hundreds of cover letters to find this out.
I do see a lot of customer having this issue, we document but it is pretty difficult to get all the docs read. Most have nothing interesting, a small percent needs to be reviewed.


Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Apr 17, 2021

    IBM does not intend to provide a different solution to this request at this time, so it is being closed.

    There is a tool available through Preventive Service Planning (PSP) that shows only the PTFs for a PTF group that have special instructions in their cover letters. This limits the number of PTFs that need to be examined when preparing to apply a new PTF group.

    This is the link to the PSP site:
    http://techsupport.rchland.ibm.com/s_dir/sline003.nsf/GroupPTFs?OpenView&Start=1&Count=30&Expand=1#1

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Sep 3, 2020

    Hello,

    you can using "IBM Administration Runtime Expert for i" to compare the PTF´s between Test and Produktion System. You can also compare userprofile, systemvalue etc.

    Greeting Uwe

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Sep 3, 2020

    Attachment (Description): Image searching IBM support to get to the special instruction PTF's information.

    Screenshot 2020...
    Screenshot 2020-09-03 at 09.45.23.png
  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Sep 3, 2020

    Hello,

    IBM has create documents for special instructions, I have added an image of the results when you search for "740 Special Instruction Links".

    Once you did run into trouble you know why you need to review the PTF coverletters. Up to now I had to use the command "DSPPTFCVR CVRATR(*SPCINST) ". I agree with you that this is not very user friendly. There for sure must be a better easier way to get this done.

    Greetings Rudi

By clicking the "Post Comment" or "Submit Idea" button, you are agreeing to the IBM Ideas Portal Terms of Use.
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.