Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal

This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Workspace IBM i
Categories Hardware
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 19, 2021

D-IPL from direct attached FC tape, no HMC

a) D-IPL from direct attached fibre channel tape is no longer supported, despite direct attachment (no fibre channel switch required) being supported for many FC HBA's on the IBM i.
Only the withdrawn #5735 FC HBA still supports D-IPL from direct attached tape devices, or so we are being told.
b) D-IPL from FC Tape is not supported for LAN Console systems

Use Case:

Refer to 'Alternate restart (D-IPL) device rules' in technical document 'IBM i Removable Media: Tape and Tape Library Devices'

OBJECTIVE 1: Reliable, no hands required, automated media management using BRMS + VTL media library, centrally managed backup/recovery for 120 Small (P05) distributed stand-alone (no HMC) IBM i on Power8/9's.
- The VTL auto replicates to an offsite VTL.
- Because the systems are in office environments, the noisy SAS adapters are unacceptable, hence expensive fibre channel HBA's are being used.

You get the picture: None of that no media in drive, last week's media still in drive, Oh I forgot to move the media offsite, Oh I forgot to bring the media back, nagging the remote users to load media nonsense we always have to deal with, and then when recovery is needed and there are no backups then it is our fault.

OBJECTIVE 2: Ability to perform unattended system recovery using only the media in the VTL tape library (no lost, missing, broken, dirty DVD's, RDX's, or USB sticks, no hunting for media in drawers by a sleepy uncommitted end user in his pajamas during the whee hours of an emergency, no old media with the incorrect LIC/OS version). We all know how long it takes to restart a D-IPL recovery when there are issues with the media.

You get the picture: The ability to guarantee an acceptable RTO with none of the above nonsense we always have to deal with.

But IBM hardware restrictions won't let us implement this very common sense solution to an age old problem.

IBM's ridiculously high prices for vHMC (think 120 x $3000+ for vHMC on tiny stand alone servers), and the fact that you have to re-purchase new versions of vHMC instead of being able to upgrade (so why are we paying vHMC maintenance?) prohibits the use of vHMC on the PC's we already have onsite to host the LAN Console and the VTL, just to get past the D-IPL rules. Would you pay that kind of money just to be able to D-IPL?

Does IBM have something against the small IBM i's? So why discriminate? Does IBM want users to throw up their hands about the ancillary cost of these servers and switch to Windows? They continuously threaten to do just that, and many do.

So please remove these silly rules and let the system happily D-IPL from most everything. If the other platforms can do it so can IBM i on Power.

Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Nov 7, 2023

    This would be a great help for our remotely managed distribution center small IBM i systems. We use LAN console, not enough justification for physical or vHMC cost. We have several SST profiles that our team uses. Due to having to D-IPL from a USB device (DVD/USB/RDX) we don't get those restored. According to IBM support there is no way to restore the SST profiles after the full restore/migration is done using Appendix D of the backup & recovery guide.

  • Guest
    May 29, 2022

    Thought I would point out the D-IPL rules from IBM:

    to support my dissatisfaction with the cost of vHMC on tiny single-LPAR systems which can use only a small fraction of the function provided by the full blown vHMC product, simply for the privilege to do D-IPL from tape

    Alternate restart (D-IPL) device rules

    If all the following conditions are met, you can do an alternate IPL from a fibre or SAS attached tape drive:

    • The system is POWER6, POWER7, POWER8, POWER9, or POWER10 hardware.

    • The system is HMC-managed.

    • The system is running IBM i 6.1.0 or higher of the IBM i operating system.

    • The tape drive is attached to an IOP-less IOA

  • Guest
    May 29, 2022

    Let me clarify a few points regarding this high priority and mission critical request (for us).

    We are an IBM i software vendor in a small business niche market who sells our application preloaded and bundled with IBM Power servers. These people buy our "bundle" at a price much higher than the usual PC stuff they are used to because of application functionality and the stability of the IBM i on Power vs a PC-Windows based solution (which we also offer BTW, but without the bundled server). The application is mission critical, but there is a "price line in the sand", and it is a huge challenge for us to stay south of that line.

    Because these small companies want to focus on their business instead of operating a Power/IBM i, which they know nothing about, not only do we sell them our software bundled with an IBM i server (plus a PC for a console), we also fully manage it for them (which adds to the cost of ownership).

    The managed services include running their backups and remotely performing a D-IPL when needed, such as OS upgrades, bare metal re-installs because of a storage failure, or slipping the LIC and/or the OS (recent case was a damaged QTMHHTTP user profile as a result of a power glitch).

    We monitor these systems 24x7 so that we can recover overnight to ensure system availability during business hours. So please understand these systems are STANDALONE - there are no LPARS on these machines. They are installed on the customer's premises all over the country. We cannot just quickly drive over and plug in a USB stick or load a DVD for a D-IPL. We can however ship the system with a USB stick premounted, and hope it it is still there and working and have the correct level of LIC when we need it 7 years later. I would not bet my career on that...

    Due to the cost of Tape Media Library/VTL solutions and the already steep price for Power/IBM i + a console PC, we currently sell the system with a $300 USB RDX backup device (for which D-IPL support was added only on Power8 and later, BTW). RDX is very reliable and reasonably fast to perform backups, however:

    a) we cannot fully automate backups because it requires a human to swap cartridges everyday, and that is easier said than done with these small companies, and

    b) a bare metal recovery from RDX takes anywhere from 16-24 hours, so the RTO is off the charts unacceptable.

    c) Power7 and older could not D-IPL from RDX (thankfully most customers are now on Power8 and later).

    As the service provider we are held responsible for performing the backups and for ensuring system availability. With non-automated backups requiring end user intervention (we cannot just drive over and go and whip them into reliably swapping RDX cartridges), and a terrible RTO on RDX, we are in a no-win situation.

    We discovered an open source VTL solution that emulates IBM TS3100 and can run on the "console PC" we already sell with the system. That opens up a an affordable (just pop in a few extra hard drives) solution that can replace the RDX and will enable fully automated backups without human intervention. We have spent 6+ months developing and testing this solution and it is solid and fast. Bare metal recovery is down to 4 hours.

    As for the suggestion to use SAS, per, "SAS tape library devices are not supported..." (besides, plugging in a SAS adapter spins the CPU fans at full speed and a Boeing jet engine is not welcome in an office environment). SAS is not an option...

    Problem-1: FC HBA cost an arm and a leg. Solution: e-Bay. We bought 120 x #5735 for less than $100 a piece.

    Problem-2: Direct attached FC (no expensive SAN switch required). Certain older FC HBA adapters do support direct attach. (HOWEVER, with the recent Power 10 announcement there is no longer any support for direct attach - see

    Problem 3: D-IPL support. Apparently the #5735 is the only FC HBA that supports D-IPL (and direct attach). Again, from what I can tell, the Power10 snuffed that one too.

    Problem 4: Requirement for an HMC. Now let me be clear: We love HMC and would be delighted to have one on each customer system (remote power on and many other nice remote management features). However, at $3000 a pop for a standalone system (these customers do NOT have LPAR's), and the requirement to a buy it again each time we upgrade the customer to a new Power-generation, it is ridiclous and silly and I will keep saying that a million times until IBM comes up with a sensibly priced vHMS solution for these small customers, and include free version upgrades in the vHMC maintenance we pay. See also

    Please understand these are independant companies, each with their own brand of firewall and rules. Our access to their networks is very limited. We access the "console PC" via TeamViewer or Log-me-in, therefore the suggestion of a few central HMC's at our location is lovely but not practical, unfortunately. Each of our customers will require a vHMC on their local "console PC".

    Problem 5: Power 10. Our upcoming customer box swaps (we have the last few Power7's to migrate in 2022) cannot go to Power10 and will have to be Power9, because the carefully crafted and affordable VTL solution just became economically non-viable with Power10. It now will require an expensive SAN switch and a vHMC and a much more expensive FC HBA than the #5735. So instead of bringing much needed improvements, Power10 not only made it worse, it made it impossible to provide low cost automated hands-free backup and recovery for the small user! So what the heck do we do now?

    Finally, just to put things in perspective, as the service provider we require our customers to maintain IBM hardware and software support. Therefore, when IBM announces end of hardware support for an older model, we basically force the customers on those models to upgrade to the latest Power generation. A box swap is therefore required every 5-8 years, resulting in a price tag of nearly $40K ($5K of which is an IBM i license transfer fee, what a rip off), which is enormous for these guys. Now add another $3k for a new vHMC version (despite having paid vHMC maintenance), which is a requirement to support the new Power model. Also add the enormous additonal cost to migrate the VTL solution from Power8 to Power10 (I fear this alone will add an additonal 5-digit price bump for no additional Save-Restore benefit over Power8 or Power9).

    IBM is not making it easy for us, and for the small users, to stay on IBM i.

  • Guest
    Feb 16, 2022

    Having done some preliminary investigation, IBM agrees that it would be desirable to provide a solution for doing a D-mode IPL from direct-attached tape without the need for an HMC. It is not trivial to provide such a solution, but IBM will use this request as input to planning. No commitment is made or implied. This request will be updated in the future if IBM implements it. IBM will use votes and comments from others in the community to help prioritize this request.

  • Guest
    Dec 16, 2021

    Thank you for submitting this request. D-IPL scenarios are complex, so it will take some time to investigate further, but we'll investigate to see if there is a way to improve current functionality. Note that no commitment is made or implied. Meanwhile, placing this RFE into Under Consideration to let you know we are indeed looking into it.

  • Guest
    Dec 16, 2021

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - Hardware
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - None

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Power Systems
    Product - IBM i
    Component - Save, Restore
    Operating system - IBM i
    Source - None

  • Guest
    Dec 16, 2021

    The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.

    Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at

    Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM

  • Guest
    Dec 14, 2021

    The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a high priority requirement that is important to be addressed. The part that is High is the ability to D-mode IPL from FC without an HMC.

    Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    For more information about CAAC, see

    Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager

  • Guest
    Dec 12, 2021

    For what it's worth and I suspect you won't think it's worth much but here is my opinion:

    If you want Lights out management of a system, you really do need a HMC, not just for the recovery but for day to operations.

    If you are managing 120 systems, why don't you provide the HMC license yourself, you could have all 120 managed servers on just a couple of HMC's, there is no need for you to put the HMC on each site, you just need network access from you HMC to the ASMI ports. The client can still have an alternate console via Ethernet Ops console if that is desirable.

    I'm not sure what recovery scenario you are pitching, as you can delete all ASP's from a LPAR that is managed from today Ops Console and perform a full reload without a D mode IPL.

    It is only when you want to re-initialise the system's LIC that you need the D mode IPL. And if you really want to achieve what you want, then you can do it today, simply by preparing a USB based memory stick with a boot image of the LIC on it. You can D mode from that and then use you FC tape interface for as the alternate installation device.

    One thing that I don't understand is how your clients can afford FC adapters but not vHMC's, many FC adapters cost more that a vHMC.... Could you not give them a SAS interface and spend the saving on a vHMC license? ;-)

    If you want a bit of free advice, when you are asking someone to make an enhancement for you, they are much more likely to do it, if you don't call them "ridiculous" and "silly"

    Cheers Brad
    Steve Bradshaw
    IBM Champion, Member of CEAC, TD of
    and by day a Friendly Techie Bloke at