Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal

This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace IBM i
Categories Db2 for i
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 27, 2017

FIELDPROC - Missing record informations

Field procedures need a possibility to get field values beside the current field in the same record.
So there should be additional parameters for the field procedures like a pointer to the current record or, if not possible the current record number so the procedure could load the current record if necessary.
The current lib/file name and field name would be interesting too.

Use Case:

If a field has to be masked or not should not only depend on the current user but also on field values of the current record like e.g. customer number or adviser or something else which cannot be determined by the current field.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    May 29, 2020

    IBM does not intend to provide a solution to this request at this time, so it is being closed. The database team has a long list of higher priority requirements, so this request is unlikely to be implemented.