This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
.Reactivated this duplicate candidate to preserve unique comments it contains.
<<< Corrected Comment >>> While this RFE also mentions PDF versions, as well as the PDF format, we consider this to be a duplicate of RFE 121246.
The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a high priority requirement that is important to be addressed. Staying current with PDF formats is critical. Later versions have newer features that companies would like to use.
Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac
For more details about CAAC's role with RFEs, see http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/Blogs/i-Can/May-2017/COMMON-Americas-Advisory-Council-%28CAAC%29-and-RFEs/
Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager
Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Power Systems
Product - IBM i
Component - Print
Operating system - IBM i
Source - None
For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
Brand - Servers and Systems Software
Product family - Power Systems
Product - IBM i
Component - Application Development
Operating system - IBM i
Source - None
The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a HIGH priority requirement that is important to address.
Staying current with IBM i is essential; staying current within that software version within that version is also critical. For IBM i to be part of clients a long term archiving solution, to the ability to create PDF files as type PDF/A is a must.
Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT
Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM
Rudi,
As current as possible is normally the best. From a business perspective is a version that support PDF/A the most important thing.
Same as https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=138230
Hello Mats,
As staying current with IBM i is important, staying current within that software version within that version is also important. I found an Adobe document dated 2001 which tells about what the changes are between those version. In the RFE you suggest that a higher version then 1.4 is also fine. So I wonder if you have any idea if a higher version is better or the current highest?
In this link I learned that in 2011 version 1.7 saw the light: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Portable_Document_Format_(PDF)
What do you think version 1.4 or 1.7?
Greetings Rudi