Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 19, 2019

Option for creating vswitches in Enhanced+ HMC GUI

With recent migration to Enhanced+ GUI, we've lost the ability to create vswitches from GUI with no connected to HMC NIC

We're creating them from HMC CLI with chhwres, but it would be far more intuitive to have an option to simply create an vswitch in a pSeries (without a network interface associated) as it existed in old GUI.

Idea priority Low
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 18, 2020

    We have evaluated this request and is part of a long term roadmap, hence marking as Uncommitted Candidate for now.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 20, 2020

    Dear Dev. team, kindly check last comment:

    "A vswitch can exist without any Virtual Network on it, can and is used be used for sandboxing systems.

    In the new UI when a Virtual Network is created, indeed a vswitch can be created. But the Virtual Network is not needed in this case. When removing it, when the last Virtual Network for the vswitch is removed, the vswitch is removed, and so the sandbox vswitch is gone. With the previous interface a standalone vswitch could be created as can be done on the command line. The capability was lost with the Advance UI, so I do not think this should be seen as an enhancemlent request but a defect that needs to be repaired.
    "

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 14, 2020

    A vswitch can exist without any Virtual Network on it, can and is used be used for sandboxing systems.

    In the new UI when a Virtual Network is created, indeed a vswitch can be created. But the Virtual Network is not needed in this case. When removing it, when the last Virtual Network for the vswitch is removed, the vswitch is removed, and so the sandbox vswitch is gone. With the previous interface a standalone vswitch could be created as can be done on the command line. The capability was lost with the Advance UI, so I do not think this should be seen as an enhancemlent request but a defect that needs to be repaired.

    Bernard

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 28, 2019

    Hi,

    A new vswitch can be created from the Enhanced UI. When you add a virtual network, you can select an existing switch or create a new vswitch. In this case, it looks like the intention is to create an internal network and not a bridged network and so while adding virtual network, "internal network" option can be chosen along with creating a new vswitch. Please let us know if that addresses your concern or if there is a different use case.

    Thanks.