This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a “nice to have” low priority feature. There are work-arounds, as mentioned in earlier comments.
Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac
Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager
The request for DCM to support creating certificates and certificate requests with multiple Subject Alternative Names (SAN) has been a very popular request which resulted in a few different RFEs requesting this enhancement. This request might still get done in the future so simply rejecting it is not appropriate. It is therefore being deferred since it cannot be completed at this time.
It's the first comment for this RFE.
Hi,
Probably I missed but I cant find your comment regarding multiplied SAN def. Could you resend please.
best regards
Multiple SAN's is already explained 4 months ago (see my initial post).
Further I would suggest not to use IBM i as CA (just create the certificate chain on another platform and import it).
Hi,
Thank you for your update.
We are part of financial sector therefore we need meet several security expectation and complete internal-external audits.
Currently we have two important findings.
The server certificate "subject alternate name" need contains multiply DNS or IP entries
The CA should not self-signed, but the DCM cannot create root and subCA certs.
I attached two screens add would be fine issue imilt certs from IBMi DCM. If will we not solve the DCM can used only for import windows created certs.
Attachment (Description): SAN def--- this is my biggest issue what I should solve somehow
Attachment (Description): root and subCA
Additional details are needed regarding your examples. Could you explain more fully what you mean?
The CAAC has reviewed this RFE. More information is needed. Could you please give more details about your examples?
Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac
Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager
You can enter multiple SAN's separated by comma's if I'm correct.
For the others you need to give more information as it is unclear to me what you mean.