Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal

This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Future consideration
Workspace IBM i
Categories Performance Tools
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 28, 2021

Expand metrics visualized by Graph History

Graph History has a defined list of metrics that you can visualize.

However, the historical data collected on the system includes many more metrics than are visualized. This RFE is to request additional metrics be added to the graph history metric selection.

I'd like to see the following:
- Number of active threads in the system
- Total number of transient threads in the system
- Number of active jobs in the system
- Total number of transient jobs in the system
- Full opens

Also, of particular interest are the metrics in the QAPMHMSQPL file.

Use Case:

Historical data has many valuable use cases; expanding the metrics that are visualized can increase the value of Graph History.

For active jobs and threads, it is helpful to know the overall trend over time to help understand workload growth. Likewise with transient jobs and threads. Db2 and SQL metrics are really needed to help understand workload changes over time, or plan cache efficiency over time. Metrics related to the plan cache, in particular, can be very useful to help identify "When did something change...."

Historical data can be very useful in identifying anomalies, particularly recent issues where the full Collection Services data still exists on the system. The CS data can then be reviewed with PDI to identify what caused the usual event.

Without adding these metrics to Graph History, you have to query the historical data files directly, which can give good insights, but graphs provided in Navigator would make this useful to those that do not understand how to query the historical data directly.

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Feb 20, 2024

    Hello, I am a BP working with many IBM i clients. I am currently working with a Large client, starting an application modernization project and we are looking to address the limits to growth in the code at the same time. This customer has a VERY high number of full DB opens. We are looking to report back to management on the improvement of this known issue at this account. This single metrics, would take little space and should be relatively simple to include in history. This would certainly simplify the reporting back to management of this large customer that continues to invest in this wonderful platform. Please let mw know if there is something we can do to get this request considered in a shorter time frame. Tamara Vandersluis - R2i - Canada.

  • Guest
    May 17, 2021

    The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.

    Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at

    Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM