Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace IBM i
Categories Db2 for i
Created by Guest
Created on May 18, 2021

R740 SQE_NATIVE_ACCESS (based on 2 IBM cases : TS004432605 and TS004432605)

Since the time OPNQRYF was introduced and until 7.3 (including), after opening a file
by OPNQRYF the estimated number of record was set properly in the Open Feedback Area.

In recent releases there was a need to use a special QAQQINI . As long as we

had a way to get the number, we were happy.

The problem is that on 7.4 there is NO WAY to get it.

The product is used by hundreds of Customers.

Customers ARE AWARE that we are in touch with IBM Business Architect, Db2 for
IBM i ) in this regard. We are willing to share with you a high number or written complains.

Our and many AS400 users demand to return the situation as it already was OS7.3 version or to allow manual bypass as it was in QAQQINI file in OS7.3


Use Case:

See example how it was defined under OS7.3 with our product:

Database access behavior is controlled by parameters in the QAQQINI file.
The entry above enables you to set the effective QAQQINI file to be used
for FileScope operations only.

This setting is especially important for release 7.2, which enables the
use of SQL Query Engine (SQE) instead of Classic Query Engine (CQE) for
native database access. To preserve the classic behavior, copy the QAQQINI
file from QSYS to the library you defined in the parameter above and add a
new record to the file.

Set the value of the fields as follows:
QQPARM SQE_NATIVE_ACCESS
QQVAL *NO


Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 3, 2022
    IBM believes that the request has been solved .

    The change was delivered as part of the 7.4 Db2 for i PTF Group SF99704 level 16.

    Db2 for i development team
    IBM Power Systems Development
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Oct 5, 2021

    When this RFE was received and evaluated in early summer, it was too late to implement it for the DB PTF Group that was delivered in September. A solution is currently undergoing its final testing and will be part of the 7.4 Db2 for i PTF Group SF99704 level 16, currently planned to be released on November 12, 2021.

    This RFE will be updated when the change is available.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 29, 2021

    Dear IBM ,
    When we will get solution for this case?
    can it be in OS 7.5 or as PTF for 7.4 ?

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Aug 5, 2021

    Dear IBM

    Please update us about the solution that we asked for 10000+ IBM i users

    from all over the world

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jul 12, 2021

    The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a HIGH priority requirement that is important to address.
    IBM i 7.4 should not be taking away support that was available in earlier releases, without prior warning.

    Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT

    Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Jun 15, 2021

    IBM will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. This request will be updated in the future if IBM implements it.

    We are investigating a solution with a new QAQQINI option that would only affect processing for OPNQRYF so the estimated number of records will be available like before.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 18, 2021

    The CAAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a high priority requirement that is important to be addressed. IBM i 7.4 should not be taking away support that was available in earlier releases.

    Background: The COMMON Americas Advisory Council (CAAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CAAC has a key role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community, and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    For more information about CAAC, see www.common.org/caac

    Nancy Uthke-Schmucki - CAAC Program Manager