This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
Shape the future of IBM!
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Search existing ideas
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updateson them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post your ideas
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use
We are working at Valeo on DOORS application at AWS, and with a pool of Application servers that have the Client version installed -> Front End (FE), and other pool that have the Database -> Back End (BE). We have dimension the servers with enough performance for avoid CPU/Memory risks, but this suppose also a high cost to pay to AWS. With the Kurbenetes Technology, We could have a POD composed from a container for FE + a container for BE and We could activate and deactivate at AWS as much PODs as We could need according the number of Users that connect to the application through the different hours (as We have Users from working on it Worldwide). In this way, We could have a flexible DOORS installation that could let us save money on AWS services management. I consider that it would be efficient to prepare DOORS application for work with Kurbenetes. Thanks You
Do not place IBM confidential, company confidential, or personal information into any field.