Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Not under consideration
Workspace IBM i
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 8, 2013

Allow condition indicators at record level in screen designer

The SDA and Code/400 Designer products have always had the ability to set condition indicators during the design mode in order to overlay or hide fields on the display.
This function is needed when there are multiple fields on a record occupying the same or overlaying positions in the record, but conditioned by different indicators.


Use Case:

This function is needed when there are multiple fields on a record occupying the same or overlaying positions in the record, but conditioned by different indicators.


Idea priority High
  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Sep 14, 2015

    Due to processing by IBM, this request was reassigned to have the following updated attributes:
    Brand - Servers and Systems Software
    Product family - Programming Languages
    Product - Developer for Power Systems

    For recording keeping, the previous attributes were:
    Brand - Rational
    Product family - Design & development
    Product - Developer for Power Systems

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Dec 2, 2013

    The requested information was not provided and the RFE is being closed.

    Feel free to resubmit this RFE with the information that was requested.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Nov 13, 2013

    Please also consider the need to show DSPATR(ND) items with some sort of outline. If there are DPATR(ND) items I have to know to move my cursor over the position to select the field. In browse mode there is no way to select DSPATR(ND) items.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    May 6, 2013

    This RFE is consistent with our strategy and product roadmap and IBM is continuing to evaluate.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |
    Apr 9, 2013

    Hi Jeff,
    If I understand you correctly, the pain point is working with overlapping fields on the design page. In CODE Designer this was handled by respecting indicators on the design mode, but in Screen Designer this was a decision up front that the effect of condition indicators would be shown on the preview page. So this goes against one of the basic design decision.
    However, we could address the pain point by visually highlighting overlapping fields and allowing the user to pick which one is on top, using the context menu. Would you accept rescoping the RFE to this latter suggestion?