This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
https://public.dhe.ibm.com/systems/support/planning/transfer/IBM.Db2.Web.Query.for.i.FAQ.pdf
IBM agrees with the request and intends to provide a solution. However, IBM's plans may change and no commitment is made that a solution will be provided.
IBM will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. This request will be updated in the future if IBM implements it. IBM will use votes and comments from others in the community to help prioritize this request.
Received as a candidate
hi, the rfe has the status "Informaton Provided".
Which Information ?
Thanks for the screenshot. Checking to see if there are 'hard coding' column width capabilities.
Attachment (Description)
any way to make this reports more readable are a improvement.
it depends what exactly is to do.
are the reports after the 'hard coded' changes editable in IA ?
the best solution would be if it can be done in info-assist.
changing the code is better than nothing or than now.
I'll add a screenshot as attachment.
Also, could you attach a screen shot when they are not aligned?
Make sense.
Given that, would it be acceptable to have a way to more strictly define the column positions? It would still require a document of multiple reports, but you would be able to 'hard code' how the columns are laid out.
Thank you for responding.
Yes, your suggestion is what I'm currently do.
But the problem that the columns-width of this two reports is not the same because the width of the columns depends on the data, and sum-fields contain normaly a higher value so they are expanded.
think on a report that has 10 numeric columns with this kind of sum. so you cann't positioning the sum-fields exactly under the numeric columns.
Thank you for submitting your request to IBM.
One usual suggestion for this is to create two (or more) reports and then create a document combining the multiple reports. Do you think this might work for you? In essence the reports will be additive, with the second report shown after the results of the first report.