Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal


This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Submitted
Workspace PowerVM VIOS
Created by Guest
Created on Oct 9, 2024

Removal of 4-Core Limit for IBM-i VMs on the S1022

Description:

As a forward-thinking organization leveraging IBM-i on the S1022 server, we are consistently seeking ways to enhance performance, optimize resource utilization, and meet our increasing workload demands. In light of this, we submit the following request for your consideration.

Request:

We propose the elimination of the current 4-core limit imposed on IBM-i VMs running on the S1022 server. This enhancement would better align the S1022 capabilities with modern enterprise needs and maximize the utilization of available hardware resources.

Justification:

Maximized Resource Utilization:

  • The S1022 server is equipped with advanced hardware capable of handling high-intensity workloads. The 4-core limitation artificially constrains our ability to maximize these powerful resources.

Enterprise Demand and Scalability:

  • Our enterprise environment requires the flexibility to allocate more than 4 cores to a single VM to support larger and more complex applications. Removing this limitation will allow for greater scalability and seamless growth.

Performance Efficiency:

  • Eliminating this restriction will improve VM performance by enabling more efficient CPU resource allocation, thus enhancing response times and overall system performance.

Competitive Advantage:

  • Removing this restriction will position IBM-i on the S1022 as a more competitive offering in the market, providing customers with the flexibility and performance they require.

Consistent with Physical Capabilities:

  • There are no inherent physical constraints that necessitate the 4-core limit. The S1022 hardware is inherently capable of supporting higher core allocations, and lifting this limit will align the policy with the server's capable architecture.

Cost Efficiency:

  • Allowing higher core limits will optimize infrastructure investments by enabling us to deploy fewer but more powerful VMs, reducing overall hardware and licensing costs.

Conclusion:

Removing the 4-core limit for IBM-i VMs on the S1022 could significantly enhance performance, scalability, and cost-efficiency for enterprise environments. We believe this adjustment is in alignment with both the physical capabilities of the hardware and the evolving needs of IBM customers. We trust this recommendation will be given serious consideration and look forward to your positive response.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Idea priority Low