This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.
Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT
Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM
The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.
Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT
Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM
The BRMS team will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. The request will be updated in the future if the request is implemented. The BRMS team will use votes and comments from others in the community to help prioritize this request.
We have several applications, some are 3rd party, which do not support running in the iASP and therefore have to remain in *sysbas. We also have some libraries containing programs that run before the iASP is available. Some of the cluster nodes do not start the iASP and these programs would not be available if they were located on the iASP. It would require resources not readily available for us to determine if these could be moved to the iASP and then make any modifications needed for them to operate.
I do understand and agree this request is associated with the RSTLIBBRM command and not part of an HA solution.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
The BRMS team needs more information to further assess your Request for Enhancement. First, we would appreciate your feedback on why the affected user libraries cannot be moved to the IASP where PowerHA is implemented?
For this BRMS request, BRMS is willing to look into the enhancement request to support *ALLUSR in the *RSTLST object list to be used with RSTLIBBRM. Before BRMS starts investigation on this, we want to clarify that BRMS is a backup and recovery product and it is not designed to be used as an HA solution to keep system data synchronized between systems. Please acknowledge that you understand and agree that BRMS would be investigating support for *ALLUSR in a *RSTLST object list to be used with RSTLIBBRM, but not affirming this as an HA solution.
Can I vote 2,000 times for this one?