We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by posting ideas and requests to this portal to enhance a Power product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted and upvote them if they matter to you,
Post an idea
Upvote ideas and add comments to ideas that matter most to you
Get feedback from the IBM team to refine your idea
The IBM team may need your help to refine the ideas so they may ask for more information or feedback. The Power teams will then decide if they can begin working on your idea. If they can start during the next development cycle, they will put the idea on the priority list. Each team at IBM works on a different schedule, where some ideas can be implemented right away, others may be placed on a different schedule.
Some ideas can be implemented at IBM, while others may not fit within the development plans for the product. In either case, the team will let you know as soon as possible. In some cases, we may be able to find alternatives for ideas which cannot be implemented in a reasonable time.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal - https://ideas.ibm.com/ - Use this site to create or search for existing Ideas across all IBM products that are outside of Power, and track all of your personal interactions with all Ideas.
The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.
Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT
Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM
The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.
Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.
To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ ibm.biz/BdYSYj and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at ibm.biz/BdYSZT
Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM
The BRMS team will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. The request will be updated in the future if the request is implemented. The BRMS team will use votes and comments from others in the community to help prioritize this request.
We have several applications, some are 3rd party, which do not support running in the iASP and therefore have to remain in *sysbas. We also have some libraries containing programs that run before the iASP is available. Some of the cluster nodes do not start the iASP and these programs would not be available if they were located on the iASP. It would require resources not readily available for us to determine if these could be moved to the iASP and then make any modifications needed for them to operate.
I do understand and agree this request is associated with the RSTLIBBRM command and not part of an HA solution.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
The BRMS team needs more information to further assess your Request for Enhancement. First, we would appreciate your feedback on why the affected user libraries cannot be moved to the IASP where PowerHA is implemented?
For this BRMS request, BRMS is willing to look into the enhancement request to support *ALLUSR in the *RSTLST object list to be used with RSTLIBBRM. Before BRMS starts investigation on this, we want to clarify that BRMS is a backup and recovery product and it is not designed to be used as an HA solution to keep system data synchronized between systems. Please acknowledge that you understand and agree that BRMS would be investigating support for *ALLUSR in a *RSTLST object list to be used with RSTLIBBRM, but not affirming this as an HA solution.
Can I vote 2,000 times for this one?