Skip to Main Content
IBM Power Ideas Portal

This portal is to open public enhancement requests against IBM Power Systems products, including IBM i. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Delivered
Workspace IBM i
Categories BRMS
Created by Guest
Created on Nov 26, 2021

BRMS Maintenance does not honor *DENIED functional usage on media classes. STRBRMMNT to include media class granularity pls

DSI advised us to initialize the expired VTL tapes to better manage the backend storage used. we use the Restricted media classes for our Point in Time backups in Production estate. So, we seeked some advise under case mentioned above and also from ihA toolkit Lab services support (Christian Aasland) to confirm that when Point in Time backup is in progress and if BRMS maintenance is run on Production LPAR, BRMS maintenance job ((STRMNTBRM or STREXPBRM) would not touch (or skip) the restricted media classes used by point in time lpar.
Upon his test, Christian confirmed that BRMS Maintenance does not honor *DENIED functional usage on media classes.

Can such granularity check on media class functional usage be considered on media-class granularity on strmntbrm or strexpbrm by NRMS development team, which sits well with iHA toolkit setup and customers may setup BRMS maintenance job without worrying about the Point in Time status.

Snippet of email from Christian is attached for your reference.

Subject : Re: BRMS initialise expired tapes and restricted media class [TS007628118]

Hi Shripad,

I did some testing and found that the BRMS maintenance procedure does not honor denied default authorities. Until BRMS addresses this, I would recommend that BRMS maintenance not be performed while there is a flashcopy backup for that LPAR running.

I got access to your support case and Aleksandar's answer is correct, but what you could do is request that "BRMS Maintenance does not honor *DENIED functional usage on media classes".

Some background:

The BRMS flashcopy functionality only supports moving the entire QUSRBRM library from the target to the source LPAR, i.e. BRMS Xfer method *ALL. This method will put BRMS into a *STRPRC state and prevent maintenance etc. from running.

However, this creates two restrictions:
1. BRMS must not be used on the source LPAR between the time of flashcopy and when QUSRBRM is copied back
2. No concurrent BRMS+flashcopies are allowed

Both of those restrictions would be detrimental to many toolkit customers, including HSBC.

To address this, I worked with the BRMS development team to create the *CHGONLY method of moving changed BRMS records. To be clear, "worked with the BRMS team" is not equivalent to "BRMS supports *CHGONLY", rather that we worked together to identify problems so the toolkit could address them.

When a flashcopy occurs without using the standard BRMS FSFC methods (i.e. INZBRM *FLASHCOPY *STRPRC etc) BRMS is not able to protect the media, so we must do so using functional authority at the media class level. When you specify a "restricted media class" the toolkit will change the functional authority on the source LPAR to be *DENIED so media in that media class would not be used or changed. Clearly BRMS Maintenance (STRMNTBRM or STREXPBRM) isn't honoring that.

Unfortunately BRMS does not have media-class granularity on strmntbrm or strexpbrm ... I wonder if there are alternate ways to trigger the initialization? For example, building a tool that looks at the data in qa1amm to identify the tapes you need to initialize and then issuing the INZTAPBRM?
Christian Aasland
HA/DR Software Engineer & Consultant
IBM Technology - Lab Services
Phone: +1-720-342-8064
Email :
PowerHA Tools:

Thanks in advance.

Use Case:

Make STRBRMMNT or STREXPBRM commands to check media class denial status set thru restricted media class in FSFC configs

Idea priority Medium
  • Guest
    Sep 15, 2022
    The BRMS team believes that the request described has been solved and is available with the September 2022 BRMS PTFs (7.3 - SI80271, 7.4 - SI80272, and 7.5 - SI80273).
  • Guest
    Dec 16, 2021

    The CEAC has reviewed this requirement and recommends that IBM view this as a MEDIUM priority requirement that should be addressed.

    Background: The COMMON Europe Advisory Council (CEAC) members have a broad range of experience in working with small and medium-sized IBM i customers. CEAC has a crucial role in working with IBM i development to help assess the value and impact of individual RFEs on the broader IBM i community and has therefore reviewed your RFE.

    To find out how CEAC help to shape the future of IBM i, see CEAC @ and the article "The Five Hottest IBM i RFEs Of The Quarter" at

    Therese Eaton – CEAC Program Manager, IBM

  • Guest
    Dec 3, 2021

    The BRMS team will use this request as input to planning but no commitment is made or implied. The request will be updated in the future if the request is implemented. The BRMS team will use votes and comments from others in the community to help prioritize this request.